http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/nov/24/india-climate-change-barack-obama-copenhagen
Today, President Obama will host the first state visit of his
presidency, rolling out the red carpet for Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh of India. Climate change
will be high on the agenda for the leaders of the world's two biggest
democracies. And the timing is auspicious, coming only two weeks before
the start of the high stakes global climate summit in Copenhagen.
With
some trying to dampen expectations that the world will seal a new
climate agreement in the Danish capital, a US-India breakthrough on
action to reduce greenhouse gases could provide the negotiations with
much needed impetus.
But for this to happen, the two leaders need to
overcome the mistrust that has characterized recent US-India relations
on climate change and energy.
For Americans, this requires dispelling three damaging myths.
The
first myth lumps India in with China as a global economic player and US
competitor which does not need industrialized country support to switch
to a low carbon economy. In fact, while India is not Chad, neither is
it China. Within its borders, mostly in small villages, live a third of
the world's poor. Some three hundred million Indians – more than the
entire population of the United States - survive on less than a dollar
a day. Four hundred million lack electricity. They are seeking to
switch lights on, not turn them off. While a few rich Indians now boast
the same carbon footprint as the average American, India's slum
dwellers still vastly outnumber its middle class.
The second myth
casts India as the rogue of the UN negotiations, refusing to curb its
spiraling greenhouse gas emissions without rich country handouts. In
fact, while India talks tough, its actions speak otherwise.
In
recent years, New Delhi has deployed wind power incentives and high
industrial energy prices to foster an impressive nationwide shift to
clean technologies. Almost a tenth of India's installed electricity
capacity now flows from renewable sources, according to India's Prayas
Energy Group, compared with a paltry 3.8% for the United States. Not
content with seeding a renewables revolution, India's government has
implemented strong energy efficiency standards for new appliances and
buildings and launched an efficiency-based "cap-and-trade" scheme
involving 700 large industrial companies. Huge subsidies for solar
technologies are also in the pipeline. What's more, India has made this
investment in a low carbon economy despite using less energy than
either the US or China to produce each dollar of GDP.
The third myth
is that India is looking for massive cash handouts. In fact, it seeks
assistance primarily in the form of a technology partnership and
strategic climate and energy relationship with the United States, one
which aligns with America's own interests.
Technology partnerships
with US federal agencies and companies are a priority for India's
leaders because they would help drive down the costs of clean
technology and increase Indian capacity to respond effectively and
sustainably to booming domestic energy demand. On the world stage, a
high profile climate and energy relationship with the United States
would also help India's quest to establish itself as a leading economic
and diplomatic player. In addition, and understandably, India seeks
some financial support in adapting to destructive climate impacts
already underway.
What would the United States gain from such a
partnership? Access to India's growing market for clean energy
technologies, and the American jobs that such demand would generate;
leverage to persuade India to embrace more aggressive actions to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions and to subject these actions to international
verification; and improvements in U.S.-India relations that would
benefit not just the two nations but the global community and its
shared climate.
The United States, by aiding India, would also be
keeping faith with the terms of the UN Framework Convention on Climate
Change (UNFCCC), which it signed. This requires developed countries to
pay the "full incremental costs" for developing countries to implement
emission reduction measures.
Building trust, and overcoming the
damaging mud-slinging between Washington and New Delhi on who is the
more recalcitrant on climate change, will take time.
But that time
must be invested. President Obama and Prime Minister Singh can take a
first important step this month, by announcing a high level partnership
to develop new and affordable renewable energy technologies and promote
energy efficiencies. Responding to climate change is a major test for
humanity's ability to undertake swift and effective multilateral
action. The world's two largest democratic nations need to lead the
way, now, in solving this global challenge.